Writing

“When the topic is most serious, understate; when least serious, exaggerate.”

This statement above is Roy Peter Clark’s Tool #21. In his book, Writing Tools, he gives this example from John Hersey’s Hiroshima:

At exactly fifteen minutes past eight in the morning, on August 6, 1945, Japanese time, at the moment when the atomic bomb flashed above Hiroshima, Miss Toshiko Sasaki, a clerk in the personnel department of the East Asia Tin Works, had just sat down at her place in the plant office and was turning her head to speak to the girl in the next desk.

The last part of this sentence is mundane, downplayed and ordinary, yet the subject is obscenely serious.

Contrast that description with this description of former New York City mayor Ed Koch for the Associated Press:

“He is the freshest thing to blossom in New York since chopped liver, a mixed metaphor of a politician, the antithesis of the packaged leader, irrepressible, candid, impolitic, spontaneous, funny, feisty, independent, uncowed by voter blocs, unsexy, … a man oddly at peace with himself in an unpeaceful place, a mayor who presides over the country’s largest Babel with unseemly joy.”

The nonserious tone brings some freshness to an otherwise stale and dreary topic.

When I taught school — all 7th, 9th, 10th, 11th and 12th grades — teaching my students how to write was always a battle. I’d push, they’d pull. Every once in a while, you’d find a teenage girl or boy who embraced the rules of writing and who wanted to take the time to get it right, rather than just rush through it. What helped me then was an article I’d read about the beginning of the texting era, and how some teachers were disturbed when kids didn’t understand the value in a five-paragraph essay. One teacher, though, adapted to the technology. Don’t be alarmed, teachers! She commented how she taught the traditional way, but because we speak in micro-bytes and social media tools like Twitter were becoming en vogue, she adapted her lessons to include writing in 140 characters or less.

This article about how social media affects the way we write is a good reminder that technology works its way into every aspect of our lives. The impact is great, and much of the time, what separates the successful from the unsuccessful writer is how willing he or she is willing to change and adapt without violating the writing fundamentals. After all, even good Tweets use a verb after a subject.

I confess. This post isn’t about Jerry Seinfeld. I’ve never met the guy.  This tip comes at least second hand when a writer for www.lifehacker.com tells of when he hung around comedy clubs. Lo and behold, Seinfeld was performing a few jokes and offered up some advice after the show:

He said the way to be a better comic was to create better jokes and the way to create better jokes was to write every day. But his advice was better than that. He had a gem of a leverage technique he used on himself and you can use it to motivate yourself—even when you don’t feel like it.

He revealed a unique calendar system he uses to pressure himself to write. Here’s how it works.

He told me to get a big wall calendar that has a whole year on one page and hang it on a prominent wall. The next step was to get a big red magic marker.

He said for each day that I do my task of writing, I get to put a big red X over that day. “After a few days you’ll have a chain. Just keep at it and the chain will grow longer every day. You’ll like seeing that chain, especially when you get a few weeks under your belt. Your only job next is to not break the chain.

Whether your goal is to write a Tolstoy-esque novel or you just want to stop eating so much Ben and Jerry’s each night, his advice is sound. Setting deadlines for yourself until your new habits become natural is golden.

A couple of other little writing tools piqued my interest, that I thought I’d share. 750words.com and writeordie.com are two sites that encourage you to set daily writing goals of _______ number of words. The interface allows the user to character-count backwards.

Have you seen other writing tools or encourage a different kind of productivity? If so, please share!

I’m really thankful to have my job, but lately, I’ve found a few other positions that I wanted to apply for.  I spent loads of time polishing my resume and cover letter. My wife, also a writer, scoured it for weaknesses: Grammar, spelling, scan-ability are as important as highlighting your accomplishments, so I carefully edited it. I felt pretty good about it — at least until a professional resume writer reviewed it. www.jobfox.com provides a services in which they will critique your resume at no charge. They provide this services as a loss-leader. They tell you what’s wrong with it, and then they hope you’ll spend $399 on a rewrite.

When I received my critique, there were a number of ways I discovered I could make my resume stronger. Despite the careful editing, I dug out the resume writing book again and laboriously inspected each word’s impact on the overall presentation.

We know, as writers, that refining our craft is a part of the process. We know that intentional practice helps us to become better writers. We know that we have to put the piece away for a short time before picking it back up, and, if needed, to have multiple people look at our work. Sometimes, though, we need a gentle nudge that reminds me about the importance of peer review (or multiple peer review).

With this in mind, network with other writers and writing experts, seek out those who are successful. In yesterday’s post, I provided a site where writing teachers hop online for a bi-monthly live chat. Google Groups is another way to connect to other writers. Media Bistro is a third resource where you can find jobs, take classes, or connect with other writers.

What are your most helpful writing resources? Submit your favorites, and I’ll compile a list.

On the Poynter Online web site this week, there are two resources to add to your writing arsenal. First, Roy Peter Clark has a new article, “Making Words Stick With Coherence and Cohesion.” It’s a method of determining whether your sentences follow a path from Old Knowledge –> New Knowledge. Think of this as a mini-outline for your paragraphs. As a web site developer, I would call this a user path. If I’m reorganizing information on a site, I would plot the path a user would take if I wanted him or her to take action.

Here’s an excerpt from his article:

“The writer can check for coherence by indexing the parts of the text, especially the beginning, middle and end, and then write subtitles for each part, like this:

Title: Making Words Stick

Coherence and cohesion
Coherence means the big parts work together
How to test for it
Cohesion means the small parts work together
Idea behind cohesion
Examples of cohesion
How to test for it

I’ve created above a little map for how to understand this article, and you can decide whether it reflects a coherent vision or not.

What coherence does for the big parts, cohesion does for the little parts. The practice of creating cohesion is guided by some theories on how people learn. The basic idea — scandalously simplified — is that new knowledge comes from old.”

(As a sidebar, there are a number of useful tools writers can find on Poynter Online. Clark had a live chat yesterday about this particular writing tool, and he hops online every couple of weeks.)

At the end of the article, he highlights some exercises. I’d encourage you to try out his “making words stick” exercises, then comment about what success you had. I’ve written on a couple of occasions about the 10,000 hour rule : Practice intentionally for 10,000 and you can master any activity.

Without a doubt, practicing the art of cohesiveness and coherence is an exercise that can help you to become a better writer.